8 Jun
2006
8 Jun
'06
17:29
In a previous message, mlist@safenet-inc.com wrote:
So what is it that Photoshop does that the GIMP can't do? Or, that it _can_ do, but less well or less conveniently?
History tool. 'Nuff said :-) PS is also better for colour balance corrections, owing to its wider selection of tools and presets. But the GIMP is pretty darned good, provided you don't require CMYK or other (more advanced) colour spaces. And even PS can't cope with everything (won't even try to handle opaque inks or metal foils). John -- John Pettigrew http://john.pettigrew.org.uk/ http://john.pettigrew.org.uk/blog/