Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (5130 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Re: GNOME vs KDE Redoux
- From: Peter Onion <Peter.Onion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 10:02:11 +0100
- Message-id: <1146560531.6273.17.camel@xxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 10:41 +0200, Sven Burmeister wrote:
> And SuSE 10.1 did not want to supply any kernel-tainting stuff anymore. What
> else then tainting is putting non-OSS stuff into (L)GPL code? If one does not
> want to have non-OSS bits in an OSS environment, then LGPL is not really what
> one wants to supply, as it encourages to use non-OSS bits.
SuSE providing non-OSS bits as compared to customers/users adding
non-OSS code to their installed systems later are two different issues.
Peter
> And SuSE 10.1 did not want to supply any kernel-tainting stuff anymore. What
> else then tainting is putting non-OSS stuff into (L)GPL code? If one does not
> want to have non-OSS bits in an OSS environment, then LGPL is not really what
> one wants to supply, as it encourages to use non-OSS bits.
SuSE providing non-OSS bits as compared to customers/users adding
non-OSS code to their installed systems later are two different issues.
Peter
| < Previous | Next > |