Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (5130 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Suse 10.1
- From: Alvaro Kuolas <kuolas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:18:18 -0300
- Message-id: <44730B9A.7030306@xxxxxxxxx>
gonzlobo wrote:
> Perhaps I'm naive concerning Suse *, but if one has a nicely configured
> system, what's the purpose of updating if I'm current?
>
> FWIW, I've been using Suse 10.0 for about a year. I love how I don't
> require
> an entire day just to compile KDE! :)
>
> * This is my 4th distro (RedHat 5.0, Debian 3.x & Gentoo 2004.0).
> Debian &
> Gentoo did not require re-installation, just regular updates.
>
> I always do a fresh install..... Just my $.02
>>
>>
>
The next big thing will be SuSE 10.2 or SuSE 11?
I think that 11 will be good for the time of KDE 4... and 10.2 for a
good polished version with KDE 3.5.
Bugs always starts with 0 (don't know why SuSE 9.3 came so buggy)
> Perhaps I'm naive concerning Suse *, but if one has a nicely configured
> system, what's the purpose of updating if I'm current?
>
> FWIW, I've been using Suse 10.0 for about a year. I love how I don't
> require
> an entire day just to compile KDE! :)
>
> * This is my 4th distro (RedHat 5.0, Debian 3.x & Gentoo 2004.0).
> Debian &
> Gentoo did not require re-installation, just regular updates.
>
> I always do a fresh install..... Just my $.02
>>
>>
>
The next big thing will be SuSE 10.2 or SuSE 11?
I think that 11 will be good for the time of KDE 4... and 10.2 for a
good polished version with KDE 3.5.
Bugs always starts with 0 (don't know why SuSE 9.3 came so buggy)
| < Previous | Next > |