Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (5130 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] ram requirements for Suse 10.1
- From: Alvaro Kuolas <kuolas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:31:37 -0300
- Message-id: <447346F9.1030706@xxxxxxxxx>
Dave Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:19 -0400, suse@xxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Allan Noriel Estrella wrote:
>>
>>> Can I install Suse 10.1 on my machine with a 128 MB rdram? If Suse can be
>>> installed, is the machine usable( that is not too slow)?
>>>
>>>
>> It depends on what you want to do with it. I've got Xen servers running
>> in 128mb, no problem. If you want a full KDE/Gnome setup with XGL, it's
>> not gonna happen. A lightweight window manager would probably work, the
>> "Base Graphical System without KDE/Gnome".
>>
>
> You had better tell that to my portable. 800Mhz and 128mb memory. Runs
> full KDE.
>
Or my "Workstation" with it's Celeron 533MHz and 192MB of SDRAM PC66
Full KDE + Thunderbird + Mozilla Suite
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:19 -0400, suse@xxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Allan Noriel Estrella wrote:
>>
>>> Can I install Suse 10.1 on my machine with a 128 MB rdram? If Suse can be
>>> installed, is the machine usable( that is not too slow)?
>>>
>>>
>> It depends on what you want to do with it. I've got Xen servers running
>> in 128mb, no problem. If you want a full KDE/Gnome setup with XGL, it's
>> not gonna happen. A lightweight window manager would probably work, the
>> "Base Graphical System without KDE/Gnome".
>>
>
> You had better tell that to my portable. 800Mhz and 128mb memory. Runs
> full KDE.
>
Or my "Workstation" with it's Celeron 533MHz and 192MB of SDRAM PC66
Full KDE + Thunderbird + Mozilla Suite
| < Previous | Next > |