13 Feb
2006
13 Feb
'06
21:59
email.listen@googlemail.com wrote:
What stands against the argument that your stats are no proof of quality is the fact that (not only just in this example) it shows the posters I would rate amongst the best in quality. :-)
The measurement of quality you have (quoting, ratio of added content) isn't very good. I can give you many names who would score very highly on that, but whose posts I wouldn't care too much about if they disappeared completely (no names, no flamewars) Please don't start a list police here