Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4054 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] reiserfs is not trustworthy.
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:18:38 -0800
- Message-id: <200601071918.38628.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Anders,
On Saturday 07 January 2006 18:42, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2006 03:00, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > > I said it behaved like one, I didn't say it was one. And it does
> > > behave like one
> >
> > I disagree. It doesn't behave like anything at all, since it does
> > not exist at all. Not the way any real file system does, with disk
> > blocks, inodes and a directory tree. The /proc pseudo-file system
> > is just a stylized way of presenting kernel data structures.
>
> You really have a problem with the whole concept of "behaves like",
> don't you
I don't think I have any problems here at all.
> > ...
>
> In any case, it's still not "just a symlink", which was what you
> originally said
It's as close to a symlink as it is to a hardlink.
RRS
On Saturday 07 January 2006 18:42, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2006 03:00, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > > I said it behaved like one, I didn't say it was one. And it does
> > > behave like one
> >
> > I disagree. It doesn't behave like anything at all, since it does
> > not exist at all. Not the way any real file system does, with disk
> > blocks, inodes and a directory tree. The /proc pseudo-file system
> > is just a stylized way of presenting kernel data structures.
>
> You really have a problem with the whole concept of "behaves like",
> don't you
I don't think I have any problems here at all.
> > ...
>
> In any case, it's still not "just a symlink", which was what you
> originally said
It's as close to a symlink as it is to a hardlink.
RRS
| < Previous | Next > |