Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4054 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Kernel Update
- From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:08:00 -0500
- Message-id: <43C9D8B0.58A9@xxxxxx>
Carl Hartung wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 22:43, Carl Hartung wrote:
> Re-reading your earlier post, Felix, I see you're concerned that reverting to
> a previous kernel puts the rpm database out of sync with the installed
> system. I don't know why you'd rule out using CLI rpm tools (the --force and
> --justdb options will solve this problem) but running the system in that
> state until you've sorted the newer kernel problem(s) out seems a minor
> inconvenience -- particularly when it is so readily resolved.
It's more readily resolved by leaving it installed, including in
menu.lst, in the first place, which is what Mandriva's URPMI does by
default. I would expect no less from YOU, but it apparently disappoints
in this regard.
> Is this your way of suggesting a new 'rollback' feature?... one comparable to
> the one offered in Mandriva?
I know how to use Bugzilla if it becomes appropriate, but that it is not
for discovering functional existing features, which is what my OP asked
about. If the answers I've seen already are any indication, I will be
needing to find or file such a bug as my OP asks about.
--
"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord." Psalm 33:12 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 22:43, Carl Hartung wrote:
> Re-reading your earlier post, Felix, I see you're concerned that reverting to
> a previous kernel puts the rpm database out of sync with the installed
> system. I don't know why you'd rule out using CLI rpm tools (the --force and
> --justdb options will solve this problem) but running the system in that
> state until you've sorted the newer kernel problem(s) out seems a minor
> inconvenience -- particularly when it is so readily resolved.
It's more readily resolved by leaving it installed, including in
menu.lst, in the first place, which is what Mandriva's URPMI does by
default. I would expect no less from YOU, but it apparently disappoints
in this regard.
> Is this your way of suggesting a new 'rollback' feature?... one comparable to
> the one offered in Mandriva?
I know how to use Bugzilla if it becomes appropriate, but that it is not
for discovering functional existing features, which is what my OP asked
about. If the answers I've seen already are any indication, I will be
needing to find or file such a bug as my OP asks about.
--
"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord." Psalm 33:12 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/
| < Previous | Next > |