Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4054 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] How is it I get Qt from SUSE under a commercial licence?
- From: Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:43:49 +0100
- Message-id: <200601301543.50047.adrian@xxxxxxx>
Am Monday 30 January 2006 13:26 schrieb Shriramana Sharma:
> Open Qt Designer 4.10, open Help > About Qt Designer. It says:
>
> "This program is licenced to you under the terms of the Qt Commercial
> Licence agreement."
>
> Something is obviously wrong here. SUSE must have bought a commercial
> licence, and they must have by mistake compiled their version of Qt to
> produce the RPMs, whereas they should have compiled the open source
> version.
>
> In case you are wondering where I got such a Qt Designer package from,
> nowhere but
>
> ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_10.0/develo
>pment
>
> Dear SUSE developers, does something need fixing?
no, it is the free qt tar ball.
A report to qt-bugs@xxxxxxxx might make sense.
bye
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
> Open Qt Designer 4.10, open Help > About Qt Designer. It says:
>
> "This program is licenced to you under the terms of the Qt Commercial
> Licence agreement."
>
> Something is obviously wrong here. SUSE must have bought a commercial
> licence, and they must have by mistake compiled their version of Qt to
> produce the RPMs, whereas they should have compiled the open source
> version.
>
> In case you are wondering where I got such a Qt Designer package from,
> nowhere but
>
> ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_10.0/develo
>pment
>
> Dear SUSE developers, does something need fixing?
no, it is the free qt tar ball.
A report to qt-bugs@xxxxxxxx might make sense.
bye
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |