Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4054 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Official openSUSE web forum
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:32:25 +0100
- Message-id: <drcsqi$39b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Pascal Bleser wrote:
> What software to use (phpBB/vBulletin/... ...), whether we want an
> NNTP gateway or not, whether it's feasible, how, etc... will be
> discussed *later*.
I'm not discussing software, I'm discussing functionality.
Software is utterly irrelevant until the functionality is decided.
Functionality, then software, then naming standards. With perhaps the
odd iteration.
>> I'm perfectly willing to volunteer my time and resources (within
>> reason), but I suspect any real action/decision will have to come
>> from Novell though.
>
> Wrong, the decision is up to Novell/SUSE _and us_, which is why it is
> being discussed here and now.
Um, of course everyone here has the right to voice their opinion(s), but
as far as partaking in the _decision_ process, I don't see how it
works. (and I don't mind either - I'm prefectly content with being
heard.)
>> I disagree slightly. The answer is YES, but ONLY given that such a
>> webforum is merely an additional interface to already existing fora.
>> I strongly object to any officially sanctioned webforum with no
>> mailinglist/nntp interface.
>
> Well, ok, that's your opinion.
> I, for myself, don't give a **** about it if it sticks us into an
> endless discussion.
Then I respectfully submit that you haven't understood the issue.
Besides, has anyone actively argued against my and others' proposal of a
bi/tri-gated solution? Are you against it?
> So, basically, you are in favor of setting up new web forums, hosted
> by Novell/SUSE ?
Provided they are merely interfaces to e.g. a mailinglist and/or
newsgroup, yes, I'm in favour. As long as they're not separate
communities, I've always been in favour.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - managed anti-spam and anti-virus solution.
Let us analyse your spam- and virus-threat - up to 2 months for free.
> What software to use (phpBB/vBulletin/... ...), whether we want an
> NNTP gateway or not, whether it's feasible, how, etc... will be
> discussed *later*.
I'm not discussing software, I'm discussing functionality.
Software is utterly irrelevant until the functionality is decided.
Functionality, then software, then naming standards. With perhaps the
odd iteration.
>> I'm perfectly willing to volunteer my time and resources (within
>> reason), but I suspect any real action/decision will have to come
>> from Novell though.
>
> Wrong, the decision is up to Novell/SUSE _and us_, which is why it is
> being discussed here and now.
Um, of course everyone here has the right to voice their opinion(s), but
as far as partaking in the _decision_ process, I don't see how it
works. (and I don't mind either - I'm prefectly content with being
heard.)
>> I disagree slightly. The answer is YES, but ONLY given that such a
>> webforum is merely an additional interface to already existing fora.
>> I strongly object to any officially sanctioned webforum with no
>> mailinglist/nntp interface.
>
> Well, ok, that's your opinion.
> I, for myself, don't give a **** about it if it sticks us into an
> endless discussion.
Then I respectfully submit that you haven't understood the issue.
Besides, has anyone actively argued against my and others' proposal of a
bi/tri-gated solution? Are you against it?
> So, basically, you are in favor of setting up new web forums, hosted
> by Novell/SUSE ?
Provided they are merely interfaces to e.g. a mailinglist and/or
newsgroup, yes, I'm in favour. As long as they're not separate
communities, I've always been in favour.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - managed anti-spam and anti-virus solution.
Let us analyse your spam- and virus-threat - up to 2 months for free.
| < Previous | Next > |