Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4054 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] apt-rpm in Factory / SUSE Linux 10.1 (was: The goodness of Smart)
- From: Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:25:44 +0100
- Message-id: <200601141525.44544.adrian@xxxxxxx>
Am Samstag, 14. Januar 2006 01:55 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
> Christoph Thiel wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, James Ogley wrote:
> >>> To assist SMART to actually get there, I'd also like to collect a list
> >>> of "missing features" and "things that need to be fixed" until SMART
> >>> can do the job apt does for you guys. Any volunteers to create a wiki
> >>> page and file bugs (preferably at http://tracker.labix.org/)?
> >>
> >> Is the plan to include third party channels, and if so would you like
> >> the maintainers to send you channel information files
> >> for /etc/smart/channels?
> >
> > No, this is rather problematic from a legal perspective.
>
> i.e. we're still waiting for comments from Novell's legal dept. about this
> ;)
>
> Adrian ? AJ ?
I can't discuss legal issues in detail here, but we can't allow links to
illegal content on our systems. This means we have to remove them, if anyone
is adding such a link.
A second issue is for me that we can't guarantee that the content of a binary
rpm is really build from the source rpm beside. So any possible bad thing
could happen when you use (or even only install) it.
bye
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
> Christoph Thiel wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, James Ogley wrote:
> >>> To assist SMART to actually get there, I'd also like to collect a list
> >>> of "missing features" and "things that need to be fixed" until SMART
> >>> can do the job apt does for you guys. Any volunteers to create a wiki
> >>> page and file bugs (preferably at http://tracker.labix.org/)?
> >>
> >> Is the plan to include third party channels, and if so would you like
> >> the maintainers to send you channel information files
> >> for /etc/smart/channels?
> >
> > No, this is rather problematic from a legal perspective.
>
> i.e. we're still waiting for comments from Novell's legal dept. about this
> ;)
>
> Adrian ? AJ ?
I can't discuss legal issues in detail here, but we can't allow links to
illegal content on our systems. This means we have to remove them, if anyone
is adding such a link.
A second issue is for me that we can't guarantee that the content of a binary
rpm is really build from the source rpm beside. So any possible bad thing
could happen when you use (or even only install) it.
bye
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |