Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4570 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Gnome disappointment
  • From: Andre Truter <andre.truter@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:55:50 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <173f0b9f0511060255j1f6c105et64ccddd30a163240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 11/6/05, Jonathan Brooks <jonathan.brooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Financial suicide. Please see my earlier posts about gnome and SuSE
> x86_64, basically it doesn't work. There are bugs in it which mean that
> gnome hogs 100% CPU - this has been reported, has been known about for
> months, and yet nothing happens. As soon as I switched to KDE I could
> use my machine.
>

Hmm. Interesting. I have been running SUSE with GNOME desktop on two
x86_64 boxes since version 9.3 and my GNOME is not hogging my system.

Mono do that from time to time, but I disable Beagle (mono does the
same thing on 32-bit machines too). This is a problem with Beagle,
not GNOME. If you used Beagle under KDE, or Xfce, or FWVM, then you
would end up with the same problem.

> Now personally I like the clean interface of Gnome, but it seems like a
> lot more time and effort is put into making KDE stable (if a bit slow).
>
This being true, do you really think they will discontinue KDE and
commit "financial suicide"

> Hopefully there will be a U-turn soon, or I will be dropping SuSE from
> all our machines.
>

What do you mean with a U-Turn? Do you mean they should focus more on
getting GNOME better supported? (I would like that)

--
Andre Truter | Software Engineer | Registered Linux user #185282
ICQ #40935899 | AIM: trusoftzaf | http://www.trusoft.za.org

~ A dinosaur is a salamander designed to Mil Spec ~

< Previous Next >