Hello, Am Dienstag 18 Oktober 2005 10:14 schrieb meister@netz00.com:
Am Montag 17 Oktober 2005 23:09 schrieb Christian Boltz:
...
- max. 3 sig lines
As houghi already said - 4 lines are usual.
well 3 or 4 that doesn't really matter. But not: fullquote of 200 lines, one line addition and 10 lines of sig.
Yes, that's the thought behind ;-)
- no spellcheckers
Why not? Micro$oft spel chekar worgs krate, you know? ;-))
Did you ever try to post some piece of source code...it will look very strange if you use a spellchecker.
Good argument ;-) So let's say: no _automatic_ spellchecker. Manual use of a spellchecker is fine as long as you leave it out of source code etc.
And to be very correct: real names... Ok, I know, I also do not use a real name.
I also prefer realnames. But if people want to use a _spellable_ alias, it's ok for me too. However, I hate aliases like "fE3,x7~5X" ;-)
Noone should use his/her password as a mail name ;-)
*ROTFL* (what a luck this fits into 4 lines...) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Wer es sicher haben will, muss halt lesen. Was sollen wir tun? Die Leute zuhause besuchen, mit Broschüren in der Hand, "Guten Tag - ich möchte gern mit ihnen über Gott^W^W^W^Wihren Webserver sprechen"? [Ratti in fontlinge-devel]