Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4398 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
RE: [SLE] Cannot find Stolen SCO Code in Linux
- From: "Albert" <albert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:42:29 +0200
- Message-id: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAxevMM82Q/E2sjvhYQ/oJTMKAAAAQAAAAwCE17uhqRkemZ9R79U5KUQEAAAAA@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Chadley Wilson wrote:
>This looks like a prank to to me, where is the serious stuff, (facts on the
>case). I hate SCO already, but have to work with it every day.
>But suggesting someone will be out to sue a company based on a childhood
>event, doesn't mean anything.
>
>And I doubt the advert about SCO shooting babies is actually thiers.
>Lastly a professional assesment of the so called situation would be far
more
>informative and usefull, than the bad language used and the sick remarks
>made
>about SCO.
>
>What does Linux have to do with a kiddies learning toy anyway. Those things
>don't have OS's installed. They have micro chips and firmware - epproms
>etc.., normally preprogrammed with assembler code.
>
>Do you think this Eric character is a little bored. He must be one hell of
>an
>administrator! to have time to waste on what appears to be, nonsense!
>
>My 2c
It seems that you missed the
Disclaimer: This article is intended as a parody. There is no truth to these
claims, well for now at least.
and
BBspot is a satirical news and comedy source and meant to be funny. If you
are easily offended, gullible or don't have a sense of humor we suggest you
go elsewhere.
At the bottom of the articles you read and took so seriously.
As for the facts, a simple Google search for "sco vs open source lawsuit"
revealed:
http://sco.iwethey.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_v._IBM_Linux_lawsuit
and many others:
http://www.google.com/search?rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-33,GGLG:en&q=sco+vs+open+sou
rce+lawsuit
Have a good day...
Albert
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release Date: 20/09/2005
>This looks like a prank to to me, where is the serious stuff, (facts on the
>case). I hate SCO already, but have to work with it every day.
>But suggesting someone will be out to sue a company based on a childhood
>event, doesn't mean anything.
>
>And I doubt the advert about SCO shooting babies is actually thiers.
>Lastly a professional assesment of the so called situation would be far
more
>informative and usefull, than the bad language used and the sick remarks
>made
>about SCO.
>
>What does Linux have to do with a kiddies learning toy anyway. Those things
>don't have OS's installed. They have micro chips and firmware - epproms
>etc.., normally preprogrammed with assembler code.
>
>Do you think this Eric character is a little bored. He must be one hell of
>an
>administrator! to have time to waste on what appears to be, nonsense!
>
>My 2c
It seems that you missed the
Disclaimer: This article is intended as a parody. There is no truth to these
claims, well for now at least.
and
BBspot is a satirical news and comedy source and meant to be funny. If you
are easily offended, gullible or don't have a sense of humor we suggest you
go elsewhere.
At the bottom of the articles you read and took so seriously.
As for the facts, a simple Google search for "sco vs open source lawsuit"
revealed:
http://sco.iwethey.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_v._IBM_Linux_lawsuit
and many others:
http://www.google.com/search?rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-33,GGLG:en&q=sco+vs+open+sou
rce+lawsuit
Have a good day...
Albert
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release Date: 20/09/2005
| < Previous | Next > |