Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4398 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Differences between SUSE Linux 10.0 and OSS 10.0?
- From: Christoph Thiel <cthiel@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:11:44 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0509261908210.15463@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, jdd wrote:
> > > so there will be three downloadable versions, with the 10.1 alpha
> > > added to the boxed version. quite a lot.
> >
> > No there will be two versions. 10.0 and 10.0 OSS.
>
> two "stable" if you want.
I'd call them "flavours", as they are binary-compatible/identical - it's
just the selection of packages that differs.
> > > I think it would be far more simple to have only a "non OSS" ftp
> > > repository
> >
> > It would indeed be easier to have just one repository for everything
> > (including stuff that is on e.g. the guru and packman repo's)
>
> I understand SUSE want's to have a separate "non completely oss" system
> (not to mention the legally unavailable stuff), but it should be more
> simple to have the SUSE Linus OSS + in an other repository what makes
> the SUSE Linux (non OSS, these naming are awfull :-()
That would be inst-source (OSS) + inst-source-java (non-OSS) + the extra
stuff on ftp.suse.com (binary-only stuff, even contains mp3 support).
Regards
Christoph
> > > so there will be three downloadable versions, with the 10.1 alpha
> > > added to the boxed version. quite a lot.
> >
> > No there will be two versions. 10.0 and 10.0 OSS.
>
> two "stable" if you want.
I'd call them "flavours", as they are binary-compatible/identical - it's
just the selection of packages that differs.
> > > I think it would be far more simple to have only a "non OSS" ftp
> > > repository
> >
> > It would indeed be easier to have just one repository for everything
> > (including stuff that is on e.g. the guru and packman repo's)
>
> I understand SUSE want's to have a separate "non completely oss" system
> (not to mention the legally unavailable stuff), but it should be more
> simple to have the SUSE Linus OSS + in an other repository what makes
> the SUSE Linux (non OSS, these naming are awfull :-()
That would be inst-source (OSS) + inst-source-java (non-OSS) + the extra
stuff on ftp.suse.com (binary-only stuff, even contains mp3 support).
Regards
Christoph
| < Previous | Next > |