Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4398 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Differences between SUSE Linux 10.0 and OSS 10.0?
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:59:32 -0700
- Message-id: <200509242259.32343.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
HG,
On Saturday 24 September 2005 21:39, HG wrote:
> Hello!
>
> ....
> For Novell SUSE Linux 10
> - ...
> - There are installation packages in YOU that let's the users to
> download Acrobats, Javas and 3D's and so on
> - ...
PDFs can be viewed using any one of several open-source viewers. They
don't have all the functionality of Adobe Reader (the proper name, now;
Acrobat is the PDF editing and creation software from Adobe), but they
get the job done.
> ...
> Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have a OSS version working. It is
> kind of sad, that to get the OSS version usable in normal home
> environment, one must go out and install non OSS software - let's
> just hope this changes over the time.
I don't see what the alternative is. If there is no open-source software
for a given class of application or if the required algorithms are
patented, then by definition an pure open-source distribution will omit
such applications.
How can it be otherwise?
> So I guess I'll be searching for Novell/SUSE distributor...
What could be worse, eh? You'll have to put some cash into the system
that provides the software you want.
> --
> HG.
Randall Schulz
On Saturday 24 September 2005 21:39, HG wrote:
> Hello!
>
> ....
> For Novell SUSE Linux 10
> - ...
> - There are installation packages in YOU that let's the users to
> download Acrobats, Javas and 3D's and so on
> - ...
PDFs can be viewed using any one of several open-source viewers. They
don't have all the functionality of Adobe Reader (the proper name, now;
Acrobat is the PDF editing and creation software from Adobe), but they
get the job done.
> ...
> Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have a OSS version working. It is
> kind of sad, that to get the OSS version usable in normal home
> environment, one must go out and install non OSS software - let's
> just hope this changes over the time.
I don't see what the alternative is. If there is no open-source software
for a given class of application or if the required algorithms are
patented, then by definition an pure open-source distribution will omit
such applications.
How can it be otherwise?
> So I guess I'll be searching for Novell/SUSE distributor...
What could be worse, eh? You'll have to put some cash into the system
that provides the software you want.
> --
> HG.
Randall Schulz
| < Previous | Next > |