Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4398 mails)

[houghi <houghi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:52:32PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Berni, I'm not saying this for you, but to some others: please think about what "open" really is
> supposed to mean in a realistic sense, given the facts above, and not squeeze everything you'd want
> the SUSE staff do for you as being the definition of "open".

I agree and sometimes it is just to know where we stand. I have no
probnlem with some parts being open and some parts not for e.g. the WiKi
pages. It is just that I like it to be clear.

This comes perhaps from the past where Novell was not clear in e.g. the
policy if getting money for a SUSE copy was clear.

I got a non-conclusive answer, somebody else got an answer that you could
copy, but not ask money.

I do not need to get this solved at this moment. I just want to let you
know where my need for clearity comes from.

houghi
-- 
Quote correct 	(NL) http://www.briachons.org/art/quote/
Zitiere richtig (DE) http://www.afaik.de/usenet/faq/zitieren
Quote correctly (EN) http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html