Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4398 mails)

< Previous

Hi,

what the fuck are you (opensuse) doing to me...
The next time I will be classified "unknown" I will make myself unknown here...

Cheers -e

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Mail Delivery System wrote:

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
host mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]: 550 <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EEz4y-00024X-EK
for opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:55:22 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:55:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
To: opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509130253160.28011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Level: /
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required
X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie

Hi,

what (the fuck, really!!) is going on there?

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:48:31 +0200
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@xxxxxxx>
To: emoenke@xxxxxxx
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
host mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]: 550 <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EEyyM-0000vY-4G
for opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:48:31 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:48:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
To: opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509130246120.28011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Level: /
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required
X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie

Hi,

crazy. But let's see if I can post it in the end...

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:30:31 +0200
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@xxxxxxx>
To: emoenke@xxxxxxx
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
host mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]: 550 <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EEygw-0006Td-1m
for opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:30:30 +0200
X-Return-path: <>
X-Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26])
by mailbox.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1EExZE-0005GE-Jc
for emoenke@xxxxxxx; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:28 +0200
X-Received: from lists.suse.de ([195.135.221.131] helo=lists.suse.com)
by mailer.gwdg.de with smtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1EExZD-0001jm-Sf
for emoenke@xxxxxxx; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:28 +0200
X-Received: (qmail 9922 invoked for bounce); 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
Date: 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: emoenke@xxxxxxx
Subject: failure notice
ReSent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:30:13 +0200 (CEST)
ReSent-From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
ReSent-To: opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ReSent-Subject: failure notice
ReSent-Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509130230130.28011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Spam-Level: /
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.2 points, 6.0 required
0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at lists.suse.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
ezmlm-reject: fatal: List address must be in To: or Cc: (#5.7.0)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
Received: (qmail 9918 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Relay2.suse.de) (195.135.221.8)
by 0 with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 23:18:27 -0000
Received: from Relay2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD8725B8D
for <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Relay2.suse.de ([127.0.0.1])
by Relay2.suse.de (Relay2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP
id 20605-06 for <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx2.suse.de (ns2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C4425BC6
for <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailer.gwdg.de (mailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.26])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B911BB25
for <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5])
by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.42)
id 1EExZA-0001j5-Q1
for opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:25 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:16:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
To: Christopher P Robbins <robbinsc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [opensuse] opensuse wlan
In-Reply-To: <20050912150852.jf2808skgkws0048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509130049150.29577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200509121928.j8CJScl7006733@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<Pine.LNX.4.61.0509122218350.29577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<20050912150852.jf2808skgkws0048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
ReSent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:18:22 +0200 (CEST)
Resent-From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
Resent-To: opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx
ReSent-Subject: Re: [opensuse] opensuse wlan
ReSent-Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509130118220.28006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de

Hi,

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Christopher P Robbins wrote:

Quoting Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Helmut Seidel wrote:

this weekend i tried opensuse rc1 - everything looks fine but I cannot
connect to the internet via my wlan. I had the same problem with 9.3 but I
could solve this by deleting my ethernetcard in yast. In rc1 I cannot
delete
the ethernetcard. If I click on delete the card does not disappear, it
simply is markedt as "unconfigured" and that doesn't help (at least on
suse
9.3) - is there any way to delete the card?

"Not configured" in YaST is meaning "not disturbing anything else", so
you should have a closer look at your wlan interface.

And at least you need to tell what it is - your wlan interface - if you
like to avoid 1000 good, but non-relevant answers here. You should
struggle to avoid that.

Wireless has been (at least for me) a mess. I've had so many problems with
all the available drivers (lucky for me, I have a Broadcom card :( ),
from Linuxant to ndiswrapper, and NONE of them have worked at all.

Same here. Ndiswrapper is not 64-bit-aware, Linuxant does not work yet
with my Inprocomm W$-only device (stated by Jonathan - I have an implicit
Linuxant license due to /usr/src/linux/CREDITS).

At least for now, I'm resigned to the fact that wireless is non-functional
until after the release canidates, if at all. (And yes, I've reported
through Bugzilla and my driver provider - nothing has resulted from
going through either of these channels).

I have resigned, too, with my built-in device, but only regarding
ndiswrapper and linuxant. My first workaround was to use a Ralink RA2500
pc card (worked out-of-the box with all betas), but because I want to use
802.11a to get rid of microwave, DECT telephone and "wireless TV"
interferences, I use Atheros pc cards now. I know I need the non-OSS
package
/pub/suse/i386/10.0/SUSE-Linux10.0-RC1-Extra/kernel-modules+firmware/suse/x86_64/kernel-default-nongpl-2.6.13-8.x86_64.rpm

for it, but with "rpm -Uhv"'ing it separately during the YaST2 updating
phase, it continued working thru the whole beta phase.

But as Eberhard said, give us a better description of your device and what
the problems are and maybe we can lend a hand....

Maybe the helping answer is above, but maybe it is only one of 1000
useless answers as long as there only is a cry, not a description.

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)

--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)

< Previous

Next >

Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4398 mails)

A last cry before the machinery is

Search this list

List Navigation

This Thread

Follow Ups