Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4344 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] rc...
- From: jdd <jdd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:31:00 +0200
- Message-id: <4309D394.8090304@xxxxxxxxx>
Jana Jaeger wrote:
Yes.
However, in my experience, suse is very good regarding the manuals.
I cried, some years ago, when suse stopped translating it's manual to french and issued a Yeppee when Novell did it again.
The manual itself gives value to the box (online manuals are never as good as paper ones, even if they are the same :-)
jdd
--
pour m'écrire, aller sur:
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.net
http://arvamip.free.fr
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Berthold Gunreben wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, jdd wrote:
is the suse 10.0 manual part of the beta process (I missed this point)? it mayYes indeed, the roadmap of the manuals tells that they are now at
have a much harder release roadmap
translation. The only thing we could do, is setup a wiki page with
errors or improvements. Changes to the manuals are not possible
anymore.
even nicer than a wiki page IMHO: Bugs filed against the "Documentation" component in Bugzilla. Bugzilla entries are easier to track than a wiki page that's constantly evolving.
Yes.
However, in my experience, suse is very good regarding the manuals.
I cried, some years ago, when suse stopped translating it's manual to french and issued a Yeppee when Novell did it again.
The manual itself gives value to the box (online manuals are never as good as paper ones, even if they are the same :-)
jdd
--
pour m'écrire, aller sur:
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.net
http://arvamip.free.fr
| < Previous | Next > |