Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4344 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse] Should we use jigdo for some kind of downloads?
- From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:03:27 +0530
- Message-id: <42FCC147.1050308@xxxxxxxxx>
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I concur with the others when they say they've installed OOo without Java. (At least, I've done it on Win32.)
So:
1. Does OOo depend unavoidably on Java?
2. When gcj is up and satisfactorily running we'll have OOo and Java shipped?
3. Are OOo and Java the only two stumbling points?
4. If Fedora is using Java right now, why can't we?
--
Shriramana Sharma
http://samvit.org
Okay, that's said for Java. But why can't OOo be included? Isn't it released under GPL, free for anyone to recompile/include in their packages?GNU Java compiler.What's gcj and is there a problem with us doing it also?Debian? But Fedora is the same principle and it ships with OOo andFedora is building everything with gcj which we have not done yet,
Java, IIRC...
The compiler is not as mature as the SUN one but is really getting
there.
OOo can be included - the problem is that OOo needs Java... It does
not make sense to install a package with a broken dependency,
I concur with the others when they say they've installed OOo without Java. (At least, I've done it on Win32.)
So:
1. Does OOo depend unavoidably on Java?
2. When gcj is up and satisfactorily running we'll have OOo and Java shipped?
3. Are OOo and Java the only two stumbling points?
4. If Fedora is using Java right now, why can't we?
--
Shriramana Sharma
http://samvit.org
| < Previous | Next > |