Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2700 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] java-1_4_2-sun vs java-1_5_0-sun
- From: "Carlos E. R." <robin1.listas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 01:14:07 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507090112330.8245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2005-07-08 at 11:32 -0600, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
> This details incompatibilities between 1.4.2 and 1.5.0 (which, btw, Sun seems
> to be calling 5.0). For the most part, they don't seem to be of much
...
> For most people, these incompatibilities mean that a few applications, coded
> for 1.4.x and using specific features where incompatibility exists, will
> probably fail in specific, and perhaps uncommon, instances with 1.5. For
Ah, I see. Makes sense.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFCzwjCtTMYHG2NR9URAk+XAKCKgRrD2vUUUduOK3QiQ+rftBa1aQCfQUyd
2IRuw1VOOz7jpavMThdLq8U=
=Sxlj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2005-07-08 at 11:32 -0600, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
> This details incompatibilities between 1.4.2 and 1.5.0 (which, btw, Sun seems
> to be calling 5.0). For the most part, they don't seem to be of much
...
> For most people, these incompatibilities mean that a few applications, coded
> for 1.4.x and using specific features where incompatibility exists, will
> probably fail in specific, and perhaps uncommon, instances with 1.5. For
Ah, I see. Makes sense.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFCzwjCtTMYHG2NR9URAk+XAKCKgRrD2vUUUduOK3QiQ+rftBa1aQCfQUyd
2IRuw1VOOz7jpavMThdLq8U=
=Sxlj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |