Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2441 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Migration problems going from 9.2 to 9.3
  • From: Ken Schneider <suse-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:01:52 -0400
  • Message-id: <1117641712.20426.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 10:27 -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> > Fine discorse. You are to be congratulated. You are slamming one of
> > the few SuSE employes active on the list.
>
> OK, I deserved that. I didn't read closely enough. Blame it on lack of
> sleep, mea culpa. CLEARLY he described what it's for, and I'm to blame
> for misreading his response. I certainly didn't intend to "slam"
> anybody, there is a huge difference between a difference of opinion and
> a personal attack.
>
> That issue aside, I think I've raised some questions that got lost in
> the noise, specifically the item about SuSE's inability to be upgraded
> while running. Additionally, Hartmut seems to agree that it's confusing
> to have an item "System Update" that doesn't appear to function as "many
> people" believe it does, and I feel that it's a problem.
> Fundamentally, it's not as big of a problem as the inability to upgrade
> while running, however.
>

What is so important that you -have- to upgrade while the system is
running? It is always better to upgrade a non-running system. Update is
different. There are far more things changing under the hood than you
think which is why you should boot to the install media do upgrade.

--
Ken Schneider
UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998

"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably
the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge


< Previous Next >
Follow Ups