Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2441 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Migration problems going from 9.2 to 9.3
- From: Anders Johansson <andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:42:20 +0200
- Message-id: <200506012242.20767.andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 22:10, Richard Bos wrote:
> Op woensdag 1 juni 2005 22:07, schreef Jon Nelson:
> > If that could be solved, I think upgrades via apt would ROCK. I don't
> > understand what can't be taken care of at rpm installation time that
> > /is/ taken care of by installing from the media. If I knew what it was,
> > I could take care of it myself. Honestly, I'd really like to know, even
> > if it's not a technically feasible thing to accomplish, I'd like to know
> > what, exactly, is done at install time /other/ than installing RPMs.
>
> Perhaps it is the /etc/SuSE-release file or is
> it
> /var/adm/YaST/InstSrcManager/IS_CACHE_0x00000002/DESCRIPTION/description?
>
> IS_CACHE_0x00000002 may have different names....
No, it's /var/adm/YaST/ProdDB/prod_00000001
Just replace all instances of the old version number with the new
> Op woensdag 1 juni 2005 22:07, schreef Jon Nelson:
> > If that could be solved, I think upgrades via apt would ROCK. I don't
> > understand what can't be taken care of at rpm installation time that
> > /is/ taken care of by installing from the media. If I knew what it was,
> > I could take care of it myself. Honestly, I'd really like to know, even
> > if it's not a technically feasible thing to accomplish, I'd like to know
> > what, exactly, is done at install time /other/ than installing RPMs.
>
> Perhaps it is the /etc/SuSE-release file or is
> it
> /var/adm/YaST/InstSrcManager/IS_CACHE_0x00000002/DESCRIPTION/description?
>
> IS_CACHE_0x00000002 may have different names....
No, it's /var/adm/YaST/ProdDB/prod_00000001
Just replace all instances of the old version number with the new
| < Previous | Next > |