Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2441 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] 9.3 vs SLES
- From: Hans du Plooy <hansdp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:46:49 +0200
- Message-id: <1118346410.30103.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for all who replied.
Like I said, this machine will be a web/mail/dns server, and not much
else. All the major components are already in SUSE (SLES and 9.3).
The stuff that I routinely update/rebuild are mostly postfix,
amavisd-new and related packages. I don't know how SUSE feels about
package versions being updated by the client (me) but I don't think they
like it very much.
Oracle isn't even a consideration - we have no reason to use that. The
only third party database that might possibly make it's way onto this
box is Intersystems Cache, but even that I sincerely doubt - that's not
this box's job.
--
Kind Regards
Hans du Plooy
SagacIT (Pty) Ltd
hansdp at sagacit dot com
Like I said, this machine will be a web/mail/dns server, and not much
else. All the major components are already in SUSE (SLES and 9.3).
The stuff that I routinely update/rebuild are mostly postfix,
amavisd-new and related packages. I don't know how SUSE feels about
package versions being updated by the client (me) but I don't think they
like it very much.
Oracle isn't even a consideration - we have no reason to use that. The
only third party database that might possibly make it's way onto this
box is Intersystems Cache, but even that I sincerely doubt - that's not
this box's job.
--
Kind Regards
Hans du Plooy
SagacIT (Pty) Ltd
hansdp at sagacit dot com
| < Previous | Next > |