Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2441 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] SuSE Watcher question
- From: Stan Glasoe <srglasoe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:23:15 -0500
- Message-id: <200506111523.15207.srglasoe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Saturday 11 June 2005 2:21 pm, Anders Johansson wrote:
>> On Saturday 11 June 2005 21:03, Stan Glasoe wrote:
> > Am I or my system missing something here?
>
> Yes, an authenticating proxy.
>
> I should have mentioned that the curlrc is only needed if you need a
> username and password to log into the proxy. The actual proxy server and
> port settings are taken from one of the *_proxy environment variables.
Ah. don't have the ol' authenticating proxy set up yet. Another project on
the list.
So how does that tie into the SuSEwatcher/YOU and how they can't/can work
with the YOU servers? I'm thinking that the authenticating proxy is on my
end since the YOU servers aren't requiring any authentication right? So why
would I need .curlrc to keep SuSEwatcher and YOU able to talk to the same
destination? I assumed that SuSEwatcher and YOU used an identical method of
contacting and querying the servers for info on updates but apparently not.
Is this a bug or am I not seeing the reason for different ways to get at the
same (?) information?
Thanks,
Stan
>> On Saturday 11 June 2005 21:03, Stan Glasoe wrote:
> > Am I or my system missing something here?
>
> Yes, an authenticating proxy.
>
> I should have mentioned that the curlrc is only needed if you need a
> username and password to log into the proxy. The actual proxy server and
> port settings are taken from one of the *_proxy environment variables.
Ah. don't have the ol' authenticating proxy set up yet. Another project on
the list.
So how does that tie into the SuSEwatcher/YOU and how they can't/can work
with the YOU servers? I'm thinking that the authenticating proxy is on my
end since the YOU servers aren't requiring any authentication right? So why
would I need .curlrc to keep SuSEwatcher and YOU able to talk to the same
destination? I assumed that SuSEwatcher and YOU used an identical method of
contacting and querying the servers for info on updates but apparently not.
Is this a bug or am I not seeing the reason for different ways to get at the
same (?) information?
Thanks,
Stan
| < Previous | Next > |