Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2441 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] root partition not umounting?
- From: "Carlos E. R." <robin1.listas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:55:03 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506210151210.11833@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2005-06-20 at 15:18 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> > The original poster stated a problem... thus, it is broken.
>
> Agreed, but you proposed applying patches uncritically - "apply whatever
> kernel patches are available".
You omit one word from what I said: "available from SuSE". That is
critical to my statement. Not _any_ patches, but those provided by SuSE,
ie, the official patches, which are only security patches. I never
recommended to apply any patch uncritically.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFCt1dZtTMYHG2NR9URAkX/AJ9FlJ7WxWrCtH7VAClc9o1dHVZDjgCeKsSx
Ub+bOdlAmw3YcQDm8+vsKLo=
=NNvZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2005-06-20 at 15:18 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> > The original poster stated a problem... thus, it is broken.
>
> Agreed, but you proposed applying patches uncritically - "apply whatever
> kernel patches are available".
You omit one word from what I said: "available from SuSE". That is
critical to my statement. Not _any_ patches, but those provided by SuSE,
ie, the official patches, which are only security patches. I never
recommended to apply any patch uncritically.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFCt1dZtTMYHG2NR9URAkX/AJ9FlJ7WxWrCtH7VAClc9o1dHVZDjgCeKsSx
Ub+bOdlAmw3YcQDm8+vsKLo=
=NNvZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |