Constant Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
On Sunday 15 May 2005 11:24, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Constant,
On Saturday 14 May 2005 21:13, Constant Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
On Sunday 15 May 2005 10:01, Randall R Schulz wrote:
..
Does it bomb on this message? (It is also signed).
You're using PGP, Sean Rima is using PKCS7
From John's signed message:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_wnlhCpoyGQh+lYC"; charset="iso-8859-1"
From one of Sean's messages:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="----------1DAA10E22FC6446"
No, it does not bomb out on this message. I do not use PGP or at least I have never worked with encryption. Will have a look if encryption is i use in my Kmail setup.
We're not talking about your use of cryptographically signed email, we're talking about the use made by the sender and the fact that there's some library incompatibility, at least between your version of KMail and a library used when validating PGP signatures.
It can happen when dependencies are not properly recorded. It happens, not often, but we've seen it on occasion.
Yeah I seen this before with some apps, never tried Kmail. The only reason I switched my main PC back to XP is because I need to use a Geovision DVR card which is not supported by linux at all :( Sean