Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3397 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Alert
- From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:01:18 -0400
- Message-id: <426E81EE.452A@xxxxxx>
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:19, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Not exactly. After you both delete mail from a folder and
> > subsequently empty the trash, then compacting will shrink the
> > original folder the email was deleted from.
> Isn't the trash a separate folder (mail file)? I think it is and if so,
> then the original mailbox form which the message was deleted now has
> the space that message occupies marked as unused and it will indeed be
> reclaimed when that folder is compressed.
NAICT you're describing what I wrote (same difference == no difference
== disk space consumed by mail folders goes up when you "delete", and
down when you compact).
--
"Love your neighbor as yourself." Matthew 22:39 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:19, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Not exactly. After you both delete mail from a folder and
> > subsequently empty the trash, then compacting will shrink the
> > original folder the email was deleted from.
> Isn't the trash a separate folder (mail file)? I think it is and if so,
> then the original mailbox form which the message was deleted now has
> the space that message occupies marked as unused and it will indeed be
> reclaimed when that folder is compressed.
NAICT you're describing what I wrote (same difference == no difference
== disk space consumed by mail folders goes up when you "delete", and
down when you compact).
--
"Love your neighbor as yourself." Matthew 22:39 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
| < Previous | Next > |