Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3397 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 (was FireFox broken, is SuSE Pro becoming a test bed like Fedora?)
- From: Allen <gorebofh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 04:28:02 -0400
- Message-id: <20050428082802.GB30798@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:15:39AM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 04:05 -0400, Allen wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:58:20AM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 03:44 -0400, Allen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:32:37PM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:14 -0600, JD. Brown wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'm running the latest OO beta (.95) on 9.2 and loving it. So I am
> > > > > > > > totally happy with what they have included. (even though I don't have
> > > > > > > > 9.3 yet)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Life is tough. Deal with it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How is this tough? It's not tough, it's just a bad choice on SuSE's part
> > > > > > > in my opinion. One I hope doesn't continue or else I'll have to go
> > > > > > > distro shopping. And I don't think I'm alone in that sentiment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preston
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's backed by SUSE on their choice for doing this and they have developers
> > > > > > that work on OO fulltime. They did a lot of work in this Beta to make it very
> > > > > > usable. Want links???
> > > > >
> > > > > No. You're clearly just an apologist and not here to help anyone.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preston
> > > >
> > > > And you're clearly a retard. You've been told 900 times (Almost once for
> > >
> > > Is this what the mailing list has come to? Name calling? You've got to
> > > be kidding me.
> >
> >
> > I was hoping you were. After 12 hours I'm thinking you just might be
> > serious.
>
> I am serious. You, I'm not sure what your deal is.
>
> > > > each mail you've sent bitching) to tell SUSE, not us. If a browser is oh so
> > > > simple like firefox is (Your words) then build your own.
> > >
> > > You don't get it.
> >
> > You'r right, because I've yet to have the same problem you've got and I
> > have 4 versions of SUSE running here. I haven't even gotten a stability
> > issue, and it would seem no one else on this list has either.
>
> Actually, a couple have. One emailed me and I supplied at least some
> help to rollback to a previous version. I think that was email 8764.
>
> >
> > > #1 - I fixed the problem by rolling back to a previous version of
> > > Firefox. The other 899 emails (a specious number, anyway) are regarding
> > > the general stability of SUSE these days. A generally respectful
> > > discussion, minus posts like yours.
> >
> > Don't expect respect. I know I'm not the only one tired of seeing your
> > mails which have been whinning. I didn't find one bit of "respectful
> > discussion". You come off as a child.
>
> ????
>
> I came off as a child for complaining about the stability of a YOU
> update? Is this not a place to discuss SUSE or am I wrong?
No this is the OS/2 list...
> > > #2 - I never said firefox is simple. I said it's basic functionality for
> > > an OS. i.e. Functionality that should be tested before being released.
> > > Why you can't understand that, I don't know.
> >
> > Uhhh, no, you said simple, I have the mail right here.
>
> I said "basic" and what I meant is entirely different from how you read
> it.
>
> > > > After reading the rest of your mails it astounds me you've managed not to
> > > > drool on your machine enough to kill it or you, and you have this aura
> > >
> > > Yet more personal insults.
> >
> > Yet more whining.
>
> Pointing out that you can't do anything more than insult people is
> whining?
Oh a personal insult! So how does it feel? Telling me I'm incapable of
anything but insults. Blah.
> > > > about you like you're threatning US that you'll swict to another distro if
> > > > the big bad wolf doesn't fix your damn browser. SUse, we don't get paid for
> > > > anything here, it would be aBLESSING if you chose Fedora, go whine to them
> > > > and fill THEIR lists with your constant dribble.
> > >
> > > I think SuSE cares to keep customers. People like you may enjoy
> > > insulting people instead of helping them, but I think SuSE might care
> > > that people are starting to consider the distribution unstable and
> > > reconsidering whether it's worth paying for. Thus my comments. Nothing
> > > more. Definitely not worthy of your derision and rudeness.
> >
> > My OS isn't finished but if I ever market it, you can be sure if someone
> > started complaining this badly instead of telling the developers about the
> > problem, I'd personally pay for a copy of another OS and have it sent to
> > your house.
>
> okay.....
>
> Anyway, can we end this now? Are you done yelling at me?
I don't know, are you done? I've managed to get you to waste this much time
coming back to me with almost no efort. You plan on making it challenging
any time soon?
> Preston
>
>
> --
> Check the headers for your unsubscription address
> For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
> Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
> Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
>
> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 04:05 -0400, Allen wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:58:20AM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 03:44 -0400, Allen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:32:37PM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:14 -0600, JD. Brown wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'm running the latest OO beta (.95) on 9.2 and loving it. So I am
> > > > > > > > totally happy with what they have included. (even though I don't have
> > > > > > > > 9.3 yet)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Life is tough. Deal with it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How is this tough? It's not tough, it's just a bad choice on SuSE's part
> > > > > > > in my opinion. One I hope doesn't continue or else I'll have to go
> > > > > > > distro shopping. And I don't think I'm alone in that sentiment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preston
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's backed by SUSE on their choice for doing this and they have developers
> > > > > > that work on OO fulltime. They did a lot of work in this Beta to make it very
> > > > > > usable. Want links???
> > > > >
> > > > > No. You're clearly just an apologist and not here to help anyone.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preston
> > > >
> > > > And you're clearly a retard. You've been told 900 times (Almost once for
> > >
> > > Is this what the mailing list has come to? Name calling? You've got to
> > > be kidding me.
> >
> >
> > I was hoping you were. After 12 hours I'm thinking you just might be
> > serious.
>
> I am serious. You, I'm not sure what your deal is.
>
> > > > each mail you've sent bitching) to tell SUSE, not us. If a browser is oh so
> > > > simple like firefox is (Your words) then build your own.
> > >
> > > You don't get it.
> >
> > You'r right, because I've yet to have the same problem you've got and I
> > have 4 versions of SUSE running here. I haven't even gotten a stability
> > issue, and it would seem no one else on this list has either.
>
> Actually, a couple have. One emailed me and I supplied at least some
> help to rollback to a previous version. I think that was email 8764.
>
> >
> > > #1 - I fixed the problem by rolling back to a previous version of
> > > Firefox. The other 899 emails (a specious number, anyway) are regarding
> > > the general stability of SUSE these days. A generally respectful
> > > discussion, minus posts like yours.
> >
> > Don't expect respect. I know I'm not the only one tired of seeing your
> > mails which have been whinning. I didn't find one bit of "respectful
> > discussion". You come off as a child.
>
> ????
>
> I came off as a child for complaining about the stability of a YOU
> update? Is this not a place to discuss SUSE or am I wrong?
No this is the OS/2 list...
> > > #2 - I never said firefox is simple. I said it's basic functionality for
> > > an OS. i.e. Functionality that should be tested before being released.
> > > Why you can't understand that, I don't know.
> >
> > Uhhh, no, you said simple, I have the mail right here.
>
> I said "basic" and what I meant is entirely different from how you read
> it.
>
> > > > After reading the rest of your mails it astounds me you've managed not to
> > > > drool on your machine enough to kill it or you, and you have this aura
> > >
> > > Yet more personal insults.
> >
> > Yet more whining.
>
> Pointing out that you can't do anything more than insult people is
> whining?
Oh a personal insult! So how does it feel? Telling me I'm incapable of
anything but insults. Blah.
> > > > about you like you're threatning US that you'll swict to another distro if
> > > > the big bad wolf doesn't fix your damn browser. SUse, we don't get paid for
> > > > anything here, it would be aBLESSING if you chose Fedora, go whine to them
> > > > and fill THEIR lists with your constant dribble.
> > >
> > > I think SuSE cares to keep customers. People like you may enjoy
> > > insulting people instead of helping them, but I think SuSE might care
> > > that people are starting to consider the distribution unstable and
> > > reconsidering whether it's worth paying for. Thus my comments. Nothing
> > > more. Definitely not worthy of your derision and rudeness.
> >
> > My OS isn't finished but if I ever market it, you can be sure if someone
> > started complaining this badly instead of telling the developers about the
> > problem, I'd personally pay for a copy of another OS and have it sent to
> > your house.
>
> okay.....
>
> Anyway, can we end this now? Are you done yelling at me?
I don't know, are you done? I've managed to get you to waste this much time
coming back to me with almost no efort. You plan on making it challenging
any time soon?
> Preston
>
>
> --
> Check the headers for your unsubscription address
> For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
> Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
> Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
>
| < Previous | Next > |