Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3397 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Alert
- From: "Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC)" <hylton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:04:31 +0200
- Message-id: <4270FB7F.1020000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Randall R Schulz wrote:
[snip]
I hope it helped Erik as it certainly did help me.
--
========================================================================
Hylton Conacher - Linux user # 229959 at http://counter.li.org
Currently using SuSE 9.0 Professional with KDE 3.1
========================================================================
Erik,Thank you Eril and Randall. Although I knew that the umask was related to file security, I did not know how it was applied. So when the file is created the umask decreases the privileges and then only the owner, in SuSE, can change the permissions, but the umask will not affect the new permissions ie a file is created (0666), umask(022) intervenes and makes it (0644). If the user now changes the permissions to 0666 the umask does not reset the permissions.
........(snippee)
I've done this before on this list, but here goes...
Every time a program creates a file, it specifies a set of permission bits. If the program is a plain file, the program will usually (_usually_, not always) specify 0666 (read+write for owner, group and others). If the program is creating a directory or an executable file, it will usually use 0777 (read+write+execute for owner, group and others).
[snip]
I hope it helped Erik as it certainly did help me.
--
========================================================================
Hylton Conacher - Linux user # 229959 at http://counter.li.org
Currently using SuSE 9.0 Professional with KDE 3.1
========================================================================
| < Previous | Next > |