Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (2912 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] reiser or ext3
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-suse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:00:37 -0600 (CST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502111058510.25227@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, devosc wrote:
> I saw a thread a while back about reiser, and then I also saw a
> comment that ext3 is also a reiser variant, so which one to choose?
ext3 predates reiser by a considerable margin. They are unrelated.
...
> If I now choose ext3, will trying to recovery the disk be any harder,
> easier, or more reliable?
Let me put on my hat that lets me see the future: "Probable."
ext3's fsck tools is about as robust and full-featured as they get.
My advice: have backups of everything, regardless of the FS.
--
Carpe diem - Seize the day.
Carp in denim - There's a fish in my pants!
Jon Nelson <jnelson-suse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> I saw a thread a while back about reiser, and then I also saw a
> comment that ext3 is also a reiser variant, so which one to choose?
ext3 predates reiser by a considerable margin. They are unrelated.
...
> If I now choose ext3, will trying to recovery the disk be any harder,
> easier, or more reliable?
Let me put on my hat that lets me see the future: "Probable."
ext3's fsck tools is about as robust and full-featured as they get.
My advice: have backups of everything, regardless of the FS.
--
Carpe diem - Seize the day.
Carp in denim - There's a fish in my pants!
Jon Nelson <jnelson-suse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| < Previous | Next > |