Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3901 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] bru speed tweaking
- From: Michael W Cocke <cocke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:53:37 -0500
- Message-id: <khstu0djmfjkn0bst1g2j81gbqtk4l3jq8@xxxxxxx>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:12:06 -0500, you wrote:
>On Wednesday 19 January 2005 02:28 pm, Michael W Cocke wrote:
>> See, I generally write this stuff for myself and then release it if I
>> think anyone else can use it, and emails/bug reports received tell me
>> what I need to look at in my free time. Your previous message was the
>> first bug report I've ever received about daromizer. Difficult to
>> believe, I know. 8-)> If I don't know anyone is using the software
>> and it works for me, then there'll never be an update.
>
>We did converse at length when I first started using daromizer.... (July of
>last year). You answered some questions but I didn't have any bugs at the
>time. You said you wrote it for yourself so I didn't bother you with the
>problems... :-)
>
>One 'feechur' that I asked about back then and I finally implemented myself is
>to all all of the options to be placed into an options file. This wasn't all
>that tough to do an it eliminates editing the daromizer script to make minor
>changes. Also makes things easier to deal with than trying to put them all
>on one line.
>
>In looking at my copy of daromizer, I see the only things unique to the script
>file are:
>
>1) Directory where the slices are written (my $place = )
>2) DAR basename
>
>The above never change in my scheme of backups.
>
>Here's my DAR command line in the script:
>
>my $darcmd = 'dar -B '.$place.'daropts 2>./dar.log >>'.$place.'dar.log &';
>
>The options file would be a nice addition.... (huh? huh? pretty
>pleez?) :-)
IIRC, there was a minor gotcha in the version of DAR that I was
working with when I wrote daromizer having to do with the option file
feature. I think. Either that or I was just being lazy. 8-)>
I want to do some re-arranging of the way daromizer calls dar anyway -
it's too clanky making the user have to change perl code to use it. It
was always one of those "I'll get to it soon" projects... about 2
years back, I think. I'll try to get this into .81 too.
Mike-
--
If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs...
You may have a great career as a network administrator ahead!
--
Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed
site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces,
try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
>On Wednesday 19 January 2005 02:28 pm, Michael W Cocke wrote:
>> See, I generally write this stuff for myself and then release it if I
>> think anyone else can use it, and emails/bug reports received tell me
>> what I need to look at in my free time. Your previous message was the
>> first bug report I've ever received about daromizer. Difficult to
>> believe, I know. 8-)> If I don't know anyone is using the software
>> and it works for me, then there'll never be an update.
>
>We did converse at length when I first started using daromizer.... (July of
>last year). You answered some questions but I didn't have any bugs at the
>time. You said you wrote it for yourself so I didn't bother you with the
>problems... :-)
>
>One 'feechur' that I asked about back then and I finally implemented myself is
>to all all of the options to be placed into an options file. This wasn't all
>that tough to do an it eliminates editing the daromizer script to make minor
>changes. Also makes things easier to deal with than trying to put them all
>on one line.
>
>In looking at my copy of daromizer, I see the only things unique to the script
>file are:
>
>1) Directory where the slices are written (my $place = )
>2) DAR basename
>
>The above never change in my scheme of backups.
>
>Here's my DAR command line in the script:
>
>my $darcmd = 'dar -B '.$place.'daropts 2>./dar.log >>'.$place.'dar.log &';
>
>The options file would be a nice addition.... (huh? huh? pretty
>pleez?) :-)
IIRC, there was a minor gotcha in the version of DAR that I was
working with when I wrote daromizer having to do with the option file
feature. I think. Either that or I was just being lazy. 8-)>
I want to do some re-arranging of the way daromizer calls dar anyway -
it's too clanky making the user have to change perl code to use it. It
was always one of those "I'll get to it soon" projects... about 2
years back, I think. I'll try to get this into .81 too.
Mike-
--
If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs...
You may have a great career as a network administrator ahead!
--
Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed
site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces,
try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
| < Previous | Next > |