Wed, 01 Dec 2004, by alineziad@yahoo.com:
->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Theo v. Werkhoven" (twe-suse.e@ferrets4me.xs4all.nl) wrote: ---------- You sir, are bloody annoying. Will you PLEASE stop topposting and learn to reply to a specific piece of quoted text? Thank you.
Theo <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<-
It had to be replied to the entire message (whole message was relevant); I felt that a single line reply
That's just nonsence. You can not tell me that you cann't find a relevant *piece of text* in 1.5 pages of information that could be [used as] the anchor to attach your reply on.
behind a 90(?) line quotation was not a good thouht. I almost alwasy use top-quoting, unless very few
Most of your posts I'v seen are with topposting instead of topquoting.
states like that; Even so, I apologize for inconvenience; I'll try to use it always. Was that really so annoying?
Yes, it was, not just for the topposting, but also because you g{a,i}ve no clue as to what line in the OPs text you were refering to. Thanks for listening. Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 27N , 4 29 45E. + ICQ: 277217131 SUSE 9.2 + Jabber: gurp@nedlinux.nl Kernel 2.6.8 + MSN: twe-msn@ferrets4me.xs4all.nl See headers for PGP/GPG info. +