Just my opinion, but out of the box the 9.2 is much better than 9.1. ).1 was slow up unitl version 2.6.x-105 was released (for i386). Version 9.2 is much better for performance (i am a j2ee developer on linux, so i can se performance gains...) Also, all the acpi related stuff worked out of the box on my aging Latitude c840, apart of course, from the non acpi aware nvidia linux drivers. So, acutally, i can say that form 8.0 on, 9.2 is the bes out of the box. Alle 21:55, lunedì 20 dicembre 2004, Steve Kratz ha scritto:
Looking back at the list archives for the past two years, it looks to me like there is a pretty good jump in activity around each new release. I don't see that this time, at least not yet. Could that mean that fewer people are having problems?
I'd generally agree with that-- other than then buggy acpi kernel 9.2 shipped with that caused some headaches with my laptop, and the "Only available on the damn DVD" issues, it's been pretty rock solid for me.
Steve
-- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Migliaia di prodotti al prezzo che decidi tu. Fai subito la tua offerta! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid50&d -12