Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3138 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [SLE] Where suse will be ?
  • From: Sid Boyce <sboyce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:19:45 +0000
  • Message-id: <41CA7FA1.5070703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Steve wrote:
Richard Bos wrote:

Op woensdag 22 december 2004 21:12, schreef Sid Boyce:

I've installed the beta version of Solaris 10 for SPARC here, same old
same old tired CDE and as far as I can tell, same old, same old dog to
admin, so it shouldn't cause anyone's earnings to diminish if they do
Solaris for a living.



Solaris 9 comes with gnome (I believe it is 2.2). I would think that 10 would come gnome 2.6 or maybe even 2.8...


It does come with gnome, although I'm not certain which version. I suspect that it also comes with CDE since a lot of people will yell if CDE isn't there (old dogs, new tricks, etc.). I thought the default was to be gnome, but I could be mistaken. It certainly is the default at work nowadays (ok, so I confess - I work at Sun). But we don't have any Solaris 10 machines available yet in our group.

Steve

The admin tools may still be old fashioned (it's at least not comparable to yast...)



The default is CDE, at least in the beta. I didn't get around to seeing what was available at the login screen - will check later. Even new dogs don't seem to be any more flexible, we've had guys who have done Solaris 1 and 2 who refuse to use the bash shell because the lecturer got them to use ksh and I know of only one guy who came back a bash convert, some of them spend the time to become experts in using "ksh -o vi" instead, something I am determined not ever to use, I can't even remember what the keyboard fingering is for any of it. If on 2.6 and 7 I can't get bash installed (customer's objection), I just type it all in.
What, no scroungers in Sun? Surely you could get your hands on an Ultra5/10 and a cheap, i.e non-Sun IDE drive.
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer
=====LINUX ONLY USED HERE=====

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups