Peter, On Sunday 26 December 2004 18:14, peter Nikolic wrote:
On Sunday 26 Dec 2004 21:18, Randall R Schulz wrote:
...
Well, to me your, diction, spelling, punctuation and fractured grammar combine to lend a unique air of perplexity to many of your posts.
No offense, of course. As in all international fora, the standards we'd apply to professional communication are really not appropriate and often we must expend some extra effort to glean the writer's probable intention. And what's more, the phenomenon does not correlate well with English being a second language. Perhaps it's another of those afflictions of youth...
RRS
Oh i see i get slacked off now cus i aint the run O the mill , well i aint an i aint for changin either pete is pete not tom dick or harry.
If you invent your own language, expect to communicate with very few others. Reusing words from an existing language in Humpty Dumpty style is no different. We won't grok you. You could, however, have a career as an author. I'm thinking Anthony Burgess and his novel, "Clockwork Orange." He's a countryman of yours, I believe.
Pete .
Randall Schulz