Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4020 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Replacing Red Hat with SuSE.
- From: "Jerome R. Westrick" <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 01:13:11 +0200
- Message-id: <1096845191.1704.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 23:14, John N. Alegre wrote:
> OK ... If this where a single boot Linux box I would not hesitate to just
> through SuSE on the machine but here is what I am facing.
>
> I have a IBM think pad that is configured as a dual boot Linux / Windoze
> system. The only reason Windoze is on there is at times when I need it at
> client sites, I don't use it myself. Since Red Hat has dropped free iso
> distribution, I have decided if I am going to pay for Linux I am going to use
> SuSE which is IMHO a far superior product the Red Hat Enterprise.
>
> Now back to the issues.
>
> As i said the laptop is a dual boot Linux / Windoze system with GRUB as the
> boot loader. All works fine now and my inclination is to leave things as
> they are. However the Red Hat 9.0 that is on there is getting farther and
> farther away from current.
>
> My main concerns with laying SuSE 9.1 Pro over the Red Hat distribution that
> is on there are two....
>
> First overwriting of the MBR and losing GRUB and there by not being able to
> boot Windoze, and second getting the XFree86 to come up. Once I get there
> configuring the rest of SuSE is no problem. I did have had the problem of
> the MBR overwrite happen on an old Red Hat 6.x install. I don't remember how
> I fixed it but I remember it was hell
>
The SuSE boot CD, also has an option boot from disk, with this, you can
boot windows or Linux with a broken GRUB/LILO....
Then (like you said), once the GUI is up, everything is easy...
Jerry
> Anyone have any experience here?? For completness the laptop is an IBM 600
> series with a 12 gig HD and 328 MB RAM
>
> All comments welcome
> --
> #############################################
> # John N. Alegre
> # Andante Systems
> # Web Hosting
> # Web Site Development
> # www.johnalegre.net
> #############################################
> OK ... If this where a single boot Linux box I would not hesitate to just
> through SuSE on the machine but here is what I am facing.
>
> I have a IBM think pad that is configured as a dual boot Linux / Windoze
> system. The only reason Windoze is on there is at times when I need it at
> client sites, I don't use it myself. Since Red Hat has dropped free iso
> distribution, I have decided if I am going to pay for Linux I am going to use
> SuSE which is IMHO a far superior product the Red Hat Enterprise.
>
> Now back to the issues.
>
> As i said the laptop is a dual boot Linux / Windoze system with GRUB as the
> boot loader. All works fine now and my inclination is to leave things as
> they are. However the Red Hat 9.0 that is on there is getting farther and
> farther away from current.
>
> My main concerns with laying SuSE 9.1 Pro over the Red Hat distribution that
> is on there are two....
>
> First overwriting of the MBR and losing GRUB and there by not being able to
> boot Windoze, and second getting the XFree86 to come up. Once I get there
> configuring the rest of SuSE is no problem. I did have had the problem of
> the MBR overwrite happen on an old Red Hat 6.x install. I don't remember how
> I fixed it but I remember it was hell
>
The SuSE boot CD, also has an option boot from disk, with this, you can
boot windows or Linux with a broken GRUB/LILO....
Then (like you said), once the GUI is up, everything is easy...
Jerry
> Anyone have any experience here?? For completness the laptop is an IBM 600
> series with a 12 gig HD and 328 MB RAM
>
> All comments welcome
> --
> #############################################
> # John N. Alegre
> # Andante Systems
> # Web Hosting
> # Web Site Development
> # www.johnalegre.net
> #############################################
| < Previous | Next > |