Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4020 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] new v9.2 is out
- From: Allen <gorebofh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:33:33 -0400
- Message-id: <200410081533.33059.gorebofh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Friday 08 October 2004 17:12, Jim Sabatke wrote:
> Fergus Wilde wrote:
> >I'm more inclined to believe it was the 2.6 kernel than the buyout, there
> > is just so much to get right that it's impossible to make a new kernel
> > version as glitch-proof as one that has been refined for years. So far,
> > I've been rather heartened that the buyout seems not to have changed the
> > user's experience of SuSE much if at all, though obviously I can't hazard
> > a guess at what it's like to work there now.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Fergus
>
> I understand that a new kernel is difficult and risky to introduce. On
> the other hand, I've heard enough credible (to me anyway) stories that
> 9.1 was pushed to release before it was really stable.
>
> I hope if that problem exists, that it is fixed before a fine product's
> name is tarnished.
It's stable. I use it every day and so far it's been up over a month without a
lag.
> Fergus Wilde wrote:
> >I'm more inclined to believe it was the 2.6 kernel than the buyout, there
> > is just so much to get right that it's impossible to make a new kernel
> > version as glitch-proof as one that has been refined for years. So far,
> > I've been rather heartened that the buyout seems not to have changed the
> > user's experience of SuSE much if at all, though obviously I can't hazard
> > a guess at what it's like to work there now.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Fergus
>
> I understand that a new kernel is difficult and risky to introduce. On
> the other hand, I've heard enough credible (to me anyway) stories that
> 9.1 was pushed to release before it was really stable.
>
> I hope if that problem exists, that it is fixed before a fine product's
> name is tarnished.
It's stable. I use it every day and so far it's been up over a month without a
lag.
| < Previous | Next > |