Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (4020 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Juvenile antics on the list
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:30:19 -0700
- Message-id: <200410111130.19180.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Steve,
On Monday 11 October 2004 07:16, Steve Kratz wrote:
> ...
>
> A lot of Linux documentation seems to be like that - They often expect
> a certain base knowledge that makes even a simple subject difficult if
> you don't know where to find the other knowledge.
That's true, and it can hardly be otherwise. If each piece of
documentation must stand alone and cover every conceivable necessary
piece of supporting knowledge, then all documentation is essentially a
tutorial. And that may not be so bad for new users, it's another kind of
nightmare for experienced users who just need some details or to refresh
their memroy about a piece of software with which they're basically
familiar.
I'm not suggesting that Linux documentation is complete. (Although for all
I know, it really is and I've just failed--repeatedly--to find certain
information.) Writing good documentation can be almost as hard as writing
good software, and as you suggest, the skills of a good programmer do not
in themselves constitute the skills of a good technical writer. In
reality, it's not particularly common to find those disparate skills in a
single person. Add to that the multilingual nature of the user base and
you've got quite a large documentation challenge.
Randall Schulz
On Monday 11 October 2004 07:16, Steve Kratz wrote:
> ...
>
> A lot of Linux documentation seems to be like that - They often expect
> a certain base knowledge that makes even a simple subject difficult if
> you don't know where to find the other knowledge.
That's true, and it can hardly be otherwise. If each piece of
documentation must stand alone and cover every conceivable necessary
piece of supporting knowledge, then all documentation is essentially a
tutorial. And that may not be so bad for new users, it's another kind of
nightmare for experienced users who just need some details or to refresh
their memroy about a piece of software with which they're basically
familiar.
I'm not suggesting that Linux documentation is complete. (Although for all
I know, it really is and I've just failed--repeatedly--to find certain
information.) Writing good documentation can be almost as hard as writing
good software, and as you suggest, the skills of a good programmer do not
in themselves constitute the skills of a good technical writer. In
reality, it's not particularly common to find those disparate skills in a
single person. Add to that the multilingual nature of the user base and
you've got quite a large documentation challenge.
Randall Schulz
| < Previous | Next > |