Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3996 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Windoze envionment on Linux?
- From: Louis Richards <louis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:38:09 -0400
- Message-id: <4137BCF1.7060000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John Sowden wrote:
Well for starters COO has an installation and configuration program that makes it *very* easy to install/uninstall many MS programs. Their program installer will simulate reboots when needed and create the file associations for both Gnome and KDE and create the menu entries for both as well. It is possible to do this with the open source version of Wine, however COO has proved itself (IMO) to be more stable for running MS Office and this was my main use for it. Most users will find the convenience and stability of COO worth the price.
That being said, I personally rarely use the product any more. I just don't have the need. If, however, you have a need to run MS Office under Linux and want to do so easily, you should find the program quite stable and worth the price.
HTH,
Louis
what is the difference between the codeweaver program and wine. I understand
that code weaver uses wine, so is the difference:
a) 39.95
b) 3 months of install only support
?
Well for starters COO has an installation and configuration program that makes it *very* easy to install/uninstall many MS programs. Their program installer will simulate reboots when needed and create the file associations for both Gnome and KDE and create the menu entries for both as well. It is possible to do this with the open source version of Wine, however COO has proved itself (IMO) to be more stable for running MS Office and this was my main use for it. Most users will find the convenience and stability of COO worth the price.
Secondly, they seem to be very vague regarding which windows programs runUntested means it has not been tested...so they don't know if it works. Bringing up tobacco executives and Bill Gates seems more like examples of someone *not* telling you it was untested/unknown. I also find the use of the term "commercial" being used as a test of a programs quality to be a odd on a Linux list. :-)
under they product. There ad chart says that their 'supported programs' run
under their product. When you go to the 'brose the list of supported
programs, their is a field in the chart labeled 'medal'. Is this another
bill gates word invention? Under 'medal' most of the entries are "untested".
This is a commercial product? or, is 'untested' a caveat saying that they
don't know if if works (like the tobacco executives who are excused from the
room when the discussion turns to cancer, etc., for deniability). No
reference that I could find to DOS applications.
That being said, I personally rarely use the product any more. I just don't have the need. If, however, you have a need to run MS Office under Linux and want to do so easily, you should find the program quite stable and worth the price.
rsvp,
John Sowden
American Sentry Systems. Inc.
1221 Andersen Drive
San Rafael, CA 94901
U.L. Listed Central Station Alarm Service
Serving the San Francisco Bay Area Since 1967
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.americansentry.net
HTH,
Louis
| < Previous | Next > |