Paul: I've experienced your PM problem as well. It is no doubt true MS has its own ideas about disk layouts. I do not have the detail of the difference in the the LINUX world's and MS's view of partition formats. I was under pressure to get a project done so I picked up Partition Commander(PC) from VCOM, Inc. It has explicit support for ext2, ext3, and ReiserFS. I used PC for ext3 imaging as I worked through an Upgrade problem so as to save the current state of a production harddrive. It worked for me although the product does have a Windoze slant, some features need to be turned off. Page 53 of the Box product manual has a list of things I did not need for creating and copying ext3 partitions. Turning off some of those features shorten the partition coping from 4 hours to 40 minutes. Also when it copied partitions from one drive to another it had the annoying habit of Hiding the partition to "Keep the drive letters the same". Why for ext3 partitions? You have to manually unhide primary partitions, the extended primary partition does not suffer this issue. I do not know. Well, I got the job done but was not sure about all the problems. A further issue relates to the way the SUSE partitioner works and the error messages I saw coming from the LINUX fdisk utility. The difference in the way LINUX partitioner actually sets up a partition. My disks, two 40 GByte Maxtors, are configured in my ASUS A7N8X-E as Auto which is LBA which you know about already. I partitioned the first using the SUSE install YaST text mode which I prefer. It appeared very sequential, almost like it was partitioning using the raw Cylinders, Heads, and Sectors. It looked different inside PC. Once PC made a copy of the primary disk's to the secondary disk, PC reported very different Cylinders, Heads, and Sectors allocations. I just may be that these two partitions are different! I'm to busy to get out a raw disk editor, in fact I don't know one to use. I will find one or maybe someone could suggest one. GNU's parted is another partitioning utility whose manual I've printed but not read. It is high on my list of to do's in the next few days. It is worth a look as it is scriptable and could also be used in system recovery after a complete wipe out. It would be good if some knows where to find information about these different disk formats. Good luck Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
I have a hard drive that works perfectly well under Linux but Partition Magic thinks it's incorrectly formatted. I've heard that there's some disagreement between PowerQuest (the company that wrote PM) and the Linux world over what the correct format of a partition table is; each thinks the other has it wrong. Does anyone on this list know about the disagreement and the best way to get around it? (The SuSE database yields nothing.)
Paul Abrahams
-- ------------ Wolter Works - Always Innovating ------------- - Industry and Commerce Internet Invention - Internet Marketing Product Concepts & Implementation mailto:johnswolter@wolterworks.com John Wolter, President 1531 Jones Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48105-1871 USA 1-734-665-1263 Copyright 2003 John S. Wolter Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.