21 Jun
2004
21 Jun
'04
02:06
On Monday 21 June 2004 03.58, Henry Harpending wrote:
10.0.0.0 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
This line looks odd. Does this machine have 10.0.0.1 assigned to eth0?
I can't see anything wrong here but I really don't know what I am doing.
What does the routing table look like on 10.0.0.5? Does it know how to reach 192.168.0.0?
BTW does anyone know what 169.254.0.0 is?
Something suse dreamed up for 9.1 to help it communicate with windows machines. Win-boxes default to that subnet if they aren't configured