Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (5100 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Has 9.1 stabilized yet?
- From: "Jerome R. Westrick" <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 15:30:38 +0200
- Message-id: <1086096638.9598.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 12:12, Stephen Chadfield wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2004, Preston Crawford wrote:
>
> > Curious. I returned my copy after all the problems I was having with
> > filesystem corruption. I'm still not happy with the solution (returning
> > to Fedora), but I have to run SOMETHING. Has anyone figured out a single
> > point of failure as to why so many people such as myself are having
> > random problems with SuSE 9.1? I'd like to give it a go, but not in its
> > current state.
>
> I had two installations go south because of file system corruption. On the
> third install I did not use LVM partitions and all has been well.
>
Now this is starting to make sense...
does any one without LVM had file corruption problems?
I haven't had any, on any of my 3 machines (2 workstations, and a
server)...
Jerry
> --
> Stephen Chadfield
> http://www.chadfield.com/
> On Mon, 31 May 2004, Preston Crawford wrote:
>
> > Curious. I returned my copy after all the problems I was having with
> > filesystem corruption. I'm still not happy with the solution (returning
> > to Fedora), but I have to run SOMETHING. Has anyone figured out a single
> > point of failure as to why so many people such as myself are having
> > random problems with SuSE 9.1? I'd like to give it a go, but not in its
> > current state.
>
> I had two installations go south because of file system corruption. On the
> third install I did not use LVM partitions and all has been well.
>
Now this is starting to make sense...
does any one without LVM had file corruption problems?
I haven't had any, on any of my 3 machines (2 workstations, and a
server)...
Jerry
> --
> Stephen Chadfield
> http://www.chadfield.com/
| < Previous | Next > |