Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3217 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Routing question
- From: Anders Johansson <andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 05:58:38 +0100
- Message-id: <200403130558.38640.andjoh@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Saturday 13 March 2004 05.54, Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
> Suppose I have two LANs, one with fixed IP addresses in the 10.0.0.x range
> and the other with fixed IP addresses in the 192.168.1.x range, and want to
> merge them into a single network, i.e., all ethernet cards now connected to
> a single switch/hub. I assume there's a single call on the route command
> from one of the machines in the 10.0.0.x range that will make the
> 192.168.1.x computers visible, but there's no gateway needed or wanted as
> far as I can tell. What would that call on "route" be?
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
A corresponding entry will have to be added to the 192.168.1.x machines,
otherwise they won't be able to reply
> Suppose I have two LANs, one with fixed IP addresses in the 10.0.0.x range
> and the other with fixed IP addresses in the 192.168.1.x range, and want to
> merge them into a single network, i.e., all ethernet cards now connected to
> a single switch/hub. I assume there's a single call on the route command
> from one of the machines in the 10.0.0.x range that will make the
> 192.168.1.x computers visible, but there's no gateway needed or wanted as
> far as I can tell. What would that call on "route" be?
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
A corresponding entry will have to be added to the 192.168.1.x machines,
otherwise they won't be able to reply
| < Previous | Next > |