Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3217 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] What's going one here: SCO's Suit: A Match Made in Redmond?
- From: "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:03:36 -0500
- Message-id: <200403120503.43558.hattons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 March 2004 04:29 am, Fergus Wilde wrote:
> There was once a Unix company that seems to have had nice people in it
> known as the Santa Cruz Operation (SCO).
I used to build boxes with SCO Unix installed for NASA a few jobs back.
> 'Intellectual property' means
> owning ideas - it's a direct insult to all natural justice and all natural
> human evolution and is a clever mechanism to keep the rich rich and the
> poor poor. It is in itself a scam. It makes money only for lawyers and a
> few speculators - if it genuinely protected inventors we might sympathise a
> bit more.
I have to say I can't fully agree with you here. People do have a right to
keep their copyrights, etc. There are some real challenges for the computing
industry in this area, and software pattens are something I have a mixed
opinion on.
> HTH, but I think your project of trying to understand the case without
> reading a lot of detail may be difficult to see through.
I think Art did a good enough job summarizing it. The real question seems to
hinge on whether Novell are recognized by the courts as having rightful
control of the contested items. The fact MS have now entered the fray, or so
it would seem, makes me wonder if there may be some legal reprocussions
heading their direction. If what seems to have happened really did, it
probably amounts to criminal conduct.
Part of the problem with MS vs. the US Legal system is not that their lawyers
are so good, but that the DoJ understand the potential consequences of MS
stock drastically falling in price over a short period.
It's kind of ironic SuSE are involved by virtue of their new parent company.
> Fergus Wilde
STH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAUYr+wX61+IL0QsMRAnoYAKCGqJjmZoqV+nkBOqefRaZKk2tIWQCgltM/
1MbFIveLVXXN1Bghu8yBdjg=
=Lkdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 March 2004 04:29 am, Fergus Wilde wrote:
> There was once a Unix company that seems to have had nice people in it
> known as the Santa Cruz Operation (SCO).
I used to build boxes with SCO Unix installed for NASA a few jobs back.
> 'Intellectual property' means
> owning ideas - it's a direct insult to all natural justice and all natural
> human evolution and is a clever mechanism to keep the rich rich and the
> poor poor. It is in itself a scam. It makes money only for lawyers and a
> few speculators - if it genuinely protected inventors we might sympathise a
> bit more.
I have to say I can't fully agree with you here. People do have a right to
keep their copyrights, etc. There are some real challenges for the computing
industry in this area, and software pattens are something I have a mixed
opinion on.
> HTH, but I think your project of trying to understand the case without
> reading a lot of detail may be difficult to see through.
I think Art did a good enough job summarizing it. The real question seems to
hinge on whether Novell are recognized by the courts as having rightful
control of the contested items. The fact MS have now entered the fray, or so
it would seem, makes me wonder if there may be some legal reprocussions
heading their direction. If what seems to have happened really did, it
probably amounts to criminal conduct.
Part of the problem with MS vs. the US Legal system is not that their lawyers
are so good, but that the DoJ understand the potential consequences of MS
stock drastically falling in price over a short period.
It's kind of ironic SuSE are involved by virtue of their new parent company.
> Fergus Wilde
STH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAUYr+wX61+IL0QsMRAnoYAKCGqJjmZoqV+nkBOqefRaZKk2tIWQCgltM/
1MbFIveLVXXN1Bghu8yBdjg=
=Lkdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| < Previous | Next > |