On 03 Mar 2004 15:49:34 -0800
Carl William Spitzer IV
wrote: PGP is the standard with inline signatures. Its Evolution which is off track.
I don't think so. We live in an international world- inline signing/encrypting have problems with non-ascii character sets. Also pgp/mime is crucial for signing/encrypting messages with attachments.
and there is no agreement as to how to handle them.
rfc 2015 (1996): http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2015.txt rfc 3156 (2001): http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3156.txt
Its Evolution which is off track.
Sylpheed-main's and claws's authors also refuse to support inline signing/encrypting.
You might want to refer to this page:
http://www.bretschneidernet.de/tips/secmua.html.en
Charles Why is it that kmail doesn't use 'inline' as the default? One has to continually choose it because the plugin is the default. Personally, I think
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 18:32, Charles Philip Chan wrote: that may be most of my problem --that of not knowing which to use --or how. Hope I get my PW soon... finally got the confirmation e-mail. :-) -- ...CH SuSE Is All U Need Linux user# 313696 Linux box# 199365