20 Jan
2004
20 Jan
'04
22:21
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 19 January 2004 16:53, James Knott wrote:
Boy has it ever been a long time since you checked..... ;-) It hasn't been that way since 1998.
Forgot to include 95 & 98 in that. I wasn't referring to NT, 2000 or XP.
98 does not have DOS underneith. It just emulates dos with a 98 version of command.com that close inspection of reveals quite a different structure, while still supporting most but not all of the features of Dos 6.2.
Are you certain of that? I thought both W95 & W98 were based on DOS.