On Wednesday 31 December 2003 09:54 am, W.D.McKinney wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 07:33, Gary wrote:
Hi Bruce / Nick,
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:15:05 -0500 UTC (12/31/2003, 10:15 AM -0600 UTC my time), Bruce Marshall wrote:
B> On Wed December 31 2003 09:51 am, Nick Selby wrote:
It seems that the latest spate of spam is loaded with seemingly arbitrary words to defeat the Baysian processes of SpamAssassin, such as
I guess that they're doing this to increase the message size with un-spamlike words to decrease the ratio of spam-like words to non-spam-like words? Does this sound right?
Anyone ... have a sense of how to defeat this strategy with current available configurable settings on SA? Spastic? Anything?
I use a python script called spambayes, it works well against this sort of
email.