gary writes:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:33:07PM +0000 or thereabouts, Sean Rima wrote:
gary writes:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 08:47:28PM +0000 or thereabouts, Sean Rima wrote:
gary writes:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:34:46PM +0200 or thereabouts, Johan wrote:
I am a member of various lists but on this one if you click reply to sender the direct address appears and not the list. <snip> Or.... use a MUA that supports the group or list reply. <g>
I cannot recall seeing the original but Cone will ask if tyo reply to a mailing list or to the original sender
Whilst Sam has it at .56 I think he should have held the number lower, but then I guess there is v2 etc :)
I will check it out. Sam usually provides good stuff, and I use some of his work, but not others, like Courier IMAP, He sometimes gets off the protocols, and into hsi own, as with his new SMAP stuff... I am interested in Cone especially with its IMAP(S) functionality.. Will definitely check it out... Use Mutt currently as a text based MUA, and it works okay with IMAP, but not totally 100% on some features.. Should prove interesting... The best IMAP client, IMO, is by far Mulberry.. if you like GUI MUAs.
Thanks for your input..
I dislike GUI generally anyway so I tend to stick with Console stuff. I know Sam can be a stickler for RFC and I am wondering if he is not ahead of the game with SMAP Sean