I find Reiser far superior to Ext3, especially with power outages which are not too infrequent in my area. With Ext3, it would take 10 or 20 minutes, with Reiser, you hardly notice it. Kind of like comparing NTFS in win2k with FAT32 in win2k, there is no long disk scan when the computer loses power without proper shutdown. Art On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 19:51, John Andersen wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2003 23:00, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
It's been around longer then Reiserfs, and has been in much more use then reiser, which menas that any bugs have a higher likely hood of being already found (and fixed) on ext3 then on reiserfs.
But Reiser has been around long enough for horror stories to surface if they were going to. Its largely been trouble free. SuSE has pretty well standardized on it, and you just don't see many complaints.
When is long enough?
-- _____________________________________ John Andersen -- Sent using SuSE Linux and Ximian Evolution.