Mailinglist Archive: opensuse (3729 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [SLE] Pthreads?
- From: Charles Philip Chan <cpchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:44:24 -0400
- Message-id: <20030627094424.393eece1.cpchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 27 Jun 2003 08:11:41 -0500
Paul Varner <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I was able to determine is that the pthread library that Winex
> wants to use from the glibc is the NPTL (Native Posix Thread Library)
> that is currently being developed at Redhat.
So Redhat is not using kernel threads after all. You can get NPTL here:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl/
> So my take isn't that the glibc in SuSE is somewhat broken, it is that
> the glibc in Redhat is somewhat experimental and possibly buggy and
> instable.
OK, so they want you to use a non-standard library then turn around and
call your distro broken if it doesn't use it- this make no sense.
Charles
--
We are MicroSoft. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
(Attributed to B.G., Gill Bates)
Paul Varner <suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I was able to determine is that the pthread library that Winex
> wants to use from the glibc is the NPTL (Native Posix Thread Library)
> that is currently being developed at Redhat.
So Redhat is not using kernel threads after all. You can get NPTL here:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl/
> So my take isn't that the glibc in SuSE is somewhat broken, it is that
> the glibc in Redhat is somewhat experimental and possibly buggy and
> instable.
OK, so they want you to use a non-standard library then turn around and
call your distro broken if it doesn't use it- this make no sense.
Charles
--
We are MicroSoft. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
(Attributed to B.G., Gill Bates)
| < Previous | Next > |